It's amazing to find people so eager to defend the honor and trustworthiness of billionaires who have repeatedly demonstrated that they-in particular-are not to be trusted. It's like they're apologists for the prosperity gospel as revealed by Herbert Spencer.

I haven't looked at this in a while, but broadcasting over the air allows a station to force the local cable company to carry at least one of it's substations. So the consolation of broadcast ownership will affect cable subscribers as well.

The First Amendment that protects your moronic question here also protects the speech of others which is incalculably more valuable and popular.

The United States is already falling behind in AI. We cannot allow an elite yak gap!

If this guy was smart enough to cobble together a game, he may also have been smart enough to include consent to the wholesale appropriation of your data in the software license agreement.

(I think this would make the charges more difficult to prove, but probably only enough to get him a better plea offer.)

The page clearly says "Klaatu, verata, nictcugh"

He donated thousands of dollars to strip people off their right to marry. That is why he was ousted after 11 days on the job. I'm not sure that he ever said how he voted.

They paid so much more than market price that you have to think this isn't strictly a business move. (This also happened with Twitter and Saudi Arabia.)

I don't know, the law is pretty draconian. If a child under 18 tries to register, their email is sent directly to Ken Paxton.

Looking at America today, who can blame him?

The elevated inflation was the result of supply chain issues which were, in fact, transitory around the world. The prices remained high because manufacturers had no reason to lower prices (especially in the US where the economy was doing very well). It's a global tragedy that Americans didn't realize how good we had it.

This is a list of the bottom-tier dumbest MAGAts in America. Hopefully they take notice when his incompetence becomes relevant to their lives.

We've already seen this on social media, where people take a couple pieces of truth and a couple fabrications and add their own framework to create a new reality that happens to jibe exactly with their own world view.

Yes, it's also bad when it happens to the arts--but at least the shitty output can't affect anyone against their will.

I recall that even then their software was supposed to provide an edge over AMD's allegedly superior hardware (with shit drivers). Useful AI should eventually negate the CUDA advantage, but it will take more than AI to make 1.6 nm chips.

I don't know, three letter agencies are very territorial. Would you claim some random footage shows one of your toys when there was a chance it would get blabbed some Murdoch kid?